You were expecting a review of Ghost BSD, well that’s coming, hopefully this weekend. But I just heard this little bit of great news from Linux Lite: Series 5.x will have no added PPAs!!
All those extra PPAs have been a source of update woes, regressions, malfunctions, and frustrations to Linux Lite users for far too long. There were even PPAs in there for software that was already available to Linux Lite users in the Ubuntu repositories (Linux Lite is based on Ubuntu) without the added PPAs, which I think is counter to Linux Lite’s purpose. Aimed at new users and non-technical users, particularly those coming to Linux from Windows, Linux Lite aims to be the easiest “newbie distro” while remaining lightweight for use on older, modest hardware.
“Emerald,” the codename for Linux Lite 5 series, will have no added PPAs at all. That is the best possible news for Lite users who have been put off by the constant update issues that have plagued the distro in the past. When I was using it, one of the first things I always did was to eliminate all those extra PPAs, so I was able to dodge many of those update problems. I also removed them in new installations of Linux Lite for computers I was refurbishing for others.
Other improvements include some great new Tweaks in the Lite toolbox that accomplish lots of maintenance tasks with a few mouse clicks. One of the new ones is a way to clean up the crazy huge Systemd logs that accumulate on the users’ hard drive:
My friend Ralphy is no longer maintaining UnlockMe for Linux Lite, which was one of the tools I found especially useful on Lite, but lookie here! Much of his familiar and brilliant coding shows up in Lite Tweaks, which is maintained and even improved upon. I’m very glad to see this!
In my book these new developments will elevate Linux Lite 5.x series above even the venerable Linux Mint for introducing Linux to newcomers.
Hi readers and fellow technophobes,
I must be crazy to even try this, but maybe I just want to be able to say I’ve done it, y’know, for bragging rights or something. For those who don’t know what a BSD is, it’s related to Linux. Actually they are siblings, whose daddy is UNIX. There are approximately one zillion and twelve Linux distributions and less than a dozen BSD distributions, unless you count the amazing MacOS, Apple’s own operating system, which is derived from BSD!
BSD is less popular and doesn’t yet offer all the popular bells and whistles available to most Linux users, but it does have some advantages over it’s sibling: The kernel is not built and maintained just by one guy trying to herd cats like Linux is. It also doesn’t have systemd, which has grown so huge that it’s actually bigger than the kernel, and has so much “feature creep” that it’s a little scary to a lot of users, who avoid it by running to Slackware or other Linux distros that don’t have it (or don’t use it even though it’s “there,” as in MX-Linux). What got to me is the Systemd head guy saying that eventually systemd will eventually “phone home” to report on how the computers it’s installed on are used. I’m not running away from systemd, not really afraid to use it (or I wouldn’t be running Xubuntu and recommending Linux Mint for newbies! But systemd may become more of a privacy concern as it continues to expand and intrude itself upon more and more subsystems in Linux. I’m kinda hoping that Debian will drop it, and the changes will filter downstream to Ubuntu and Mint, Linux Lite, and hundreds of other Debian-based distros downstream. Now that Microsoft is jumping into Linux with both feet as well (basically buying GitHub and “taking over” the Linux Foundation, I might want to put some more distance between myself and Microsoft as well. That is more bothersome to me than systemd, frankly.
So, anyway: TrueOS is a BSD that used to PC-BSD. It was aimed at the desktop at first, but grew to a server-side kind of OS. Rather than try to be all things to all users, some sort of one-size-fits-all thing like Ubuntu and it’s derivatives and offspring, it kinda-sorta forked into two: TrueOS for servers and Trident for the desktop. Trident will be what I’ll test-drive this week if I have time, and report on later. In the meantime if you’re curious, have a look for yourself here.
Richard Stallman has resigned as president and board member of the Free Software Foundation (FSF), after taking a controversial stand that seemed to defend Jeffry Epstein’s exploitation and abuse of underage girls. It cost him his job at MIT as well.
But RMS long ago became a poor spokesman for the cause of free software (also called FOSS, free-and-open-source-software). He despised the term “open source,” insisted at we all quit saying Linux and change it to GNU/Linux because that’s the license it’s released under. He made as many enemies as friends because of his language, attitude, and insistence on so many stupid little details that mattered only to him.
You started well, RMS, but you have set free software back almost as far as it advanced. I don’t think they should even fill the position, but select several decent, personable spokespeople to articulate and advance the cause. Hopefully Mister Neckbeard will have the grace and good sense to keep his mouth shut now.
Omy. I’ve written before about how it seems that GNU/Linux and many free open-source projects seem to attract people with a politically left-wing bent. It’s certainly true on Diaspora /Friendica/Hubzilla/Mastodon etc., where my Stream (feed) was full of anti-capitalism, Trump-hate, Antifa, and even Nazi propaganda. I blocked and/or ignored many more people on Diaspora than I shared with because of all the politics in that network. But Linux is supposed to be largely neutral politically, right?
I remember the Great Linux Mint Political Train Wreck and how they quickly tried to bury it after a bunch of people who support Israel (as I do) and saw that part of their donations to Linux Mint may have ended up in the hands of anti-Zionist groups because the Lead Developer donates to them. Mint is a fantastic distro, and to it’s credit, did not mix it’s lead developer’s political views into the distro’s content. But Mint suffered a setback when it’s official blog posted an anti-Zionist political piece. It made it look as though Linux Mint officially endorsed the so-called “Palestinian” cause.
Now we have AntiX, the sister distro of MX-Linux, truly mixing politics into it’s official software distributed to users. MX-Linux is avoiding that, but because they share the same developers, both distros may suffer from unintended consequences of AntiX’s political mixture. The lead developer of AntiX calls himself “Anticapitalista,” which suggests he opposes capitalism. But that’s not enough, not this time. Now by default, included in the .iso of the distro, are several anti-Zionist bookmarks! If you happen to be an avid anti-Zionist, you probably have no problem with that. But if you install antiX and discover these bookmarks when you open the browser for the first time, you’re going to wonder if this is some kind of malware or something!
Have a look at this reviewer’s take on the matter:
This is enough for me never to recommend antiX for older computers anymore. And it sours me a little bit on MX-Linux as well, though not enough to stop recommending it, since they have remained above the fray, refusing to mix their political views into the actual software of the distribution. AntiX’s choice is worse than Linux Mint’s! When any open-source project gets so political that the line between the product and the politics is crossed, they lose my support. Whether it’s left-wing or right-wing stuff, politics and FOSS projects should never mix.
Just a reminder that Microsoft is no better than the others, and has been at it longer than most of Big Tech. The story is that MS is back to their old tricks of buying out smaller outfits and either enslaving the existing customers, or forcing them out. In this case, MS bought up LinkedIn. […]
via Microsoft Is Not Your Friend — Do What’s Right
Okay, so I found this advertisement online: It’s safe to click the link, but not to completely believe everything you find here:
It’s just whatever Linux distribution on a bootable USB thumbdrive. I’ve been making those and giving them away to people literally for years! The price is kinda high, and I don’t think a 300% markup is arguably within the terms of the GNU license. And there are going to be booting issues sometimes, no matter what distro they’re using. It’s not some new revolutionary “device” either. Just a thumb drive, available at any corner store for a nickel ninety eight.
However, the idea is kinda clever. People who would never ordinarily consider using Linux might see this and think, “gee, a new computer for twenty bucks? Why not!”