MX-17 is simply gorgeous right out of the box! But y’know I like to change things up a little bit, and I like a clean, simple, pretty desktop with just a tiny bit of bling. I still haven’t decided if I’ll keep Cairo-Dock on or go back to the awesome Xfce panel on the bottom that I always love. I’m just play’n around with it.
That’s just the notification stuff in the top panel, and favorite app launchers in the super wicked-kewl dock on the bottom that magnifies the icons when you mouse over them and bounces them when you click on one to launch it. I also always liked that 3D effect you get from the little table the icons appear to be resting on, reflected on the panel. So pretty, so cool.
This is Debian Linux made really easy, but without the instability and bloat of Ubuntu and most of it’s derivatives. With the ‘buntu-based ones (besides Linux Mint and PeppermintOS), I generally was very leery of updates from upstream (meaning, from Ubuntu). I have learned to selectively update, but for new users who haven’t learned to selectively update, I always recommend either Mint, Peppermint, or Linux Lite as long as the updater from unlockforus is installed first before updating a new installation. But that kinda limits your choices, doesn’t it? While that updater should theoretically work on any Ubuntu-based distro, including the official Ubuntu flavors (Xubu, Lubu, Kubu, etc), it’s intended only for the distros that ship with it or on Linux Lite.
Better yet, choose a distro that doesn’t need to be modified with added special software to make it safe. That’s one of the things I always hated about Windows for goodnessakes, you had to add extra stuff just to maintain the operating system! Like antivirus, anti-spyware, anti-ransomware, crap cleaners, optimizers, etc. Well I prefer to run applications, not the operating system! Of course the user should maintain his computer and it’s OS, I’m not say’n (s)he shouldn’t! I’m jus’ say’n a newcomer to Linux should start with a system that is already as safe and stable and reliable as it can be. If it’s super newbie friendly, that’s a nice bonus, but starting with a rock-stable foundation that isn’t borked by updates is, in my opinion, lots more important.
For goodnessakes I didn’t want a Linux that “looks and acts like Windows” in order to “make it easy for Windows users to adapt to Linux.” Fine, make it easy, but I don’t want a FOSS copy of the operating system I just replaced because it sucked and got in my way all the time and required abuncha bloatware and time to maintain. I want it to be different enough from Winblows to make me feel good about choosing an alternative OS, but point-and-clicky enough to be “friendly.” That’s one of the reasons I reeeeeally like the Xfce desktop! It can be modified all kindsa ways to look and behave just about any way you want it to, and it’s not a resource-hungry behemoth like KDE or Gnome. In fact, the Xfce desktop is the same one Linux Lite uses to “make it easy for Windows users to adapt.” Alot of people apparently like and want a “Windows-like” desktop, which is why Zorin and Linux Lite are so popular I guess. But for me, no thank you, I want nothing to look or act like Windows. In fact, if it looks a little scary and sinister, like “touch it and die,” that’s cool too.
Like Crunchbang Linux, for example, came with a warning that it could make your computer go “Crunch! Bang!” if you press the wrong button or something. It had a black, almost sinister-looking Openbox desktop that made you feel like a superduper-techno-wizard just for having successfully installed it! Mwahahahaaa! Now to try to take over the planet!
MX-17 is my favorite Linux now, because it’s got the newbie-friendly stuff going on (enough of it to make it suitable for competent newbies – not enough to protect them from being irresponsibly stupid), but inherently much safer with it’s Debian Stable base than any of the Ubuntu-based stuff.
5 thoughts on “My Desktop”
i followed link from MX forum. Considering the linked topic, the woodworking-ish wallpaper displayed atop the article here is both appropriate… and ironic. You want it to “just works” and ship with a finely-sanded surface, yet demand comfortable ability to shave off, round off, customize it bits-n-pieces.
Nope, for technical reasons, unlockforus cannot work on MX. However, a “ported” version of unlockforus, containing a subset of unlockforus tweaks, is available. You can find it by searching the MX forum for a topic titled “woogaloo”. Okay, I’ll go look around the rest of your blog now…
“Competent newbies”, I really liked that phrase. In fact do I use it when I make the destinction for what kind of Linux n00b I should recommend a distro.
1) total doofuses with no interest and no clue about their computing appliance
2) believers in snake oil solutions
3) Windows/Mac wizards who wanna try out one of our wonderful Linuxes for the first time
4) *buntu-ists about to learn that the GNU/Linux world is much bigger than their little slice of it
But honestly, no mattter which portion of n00bs I’m gonna address, my suggestion is almost always Linux Mint. After a couple weeks switch to Namib (Mate, better) or SWAG Arch (Xfce, not entirely as fancy as Mate) and you’re set for life.
Reblogged this on Thar She Blows! and commented:
Our friend Robin again. This time he loves his MX-17 distro. Guess I had it tested too a while ago …. let me find it …
Con tu permiso lo traduzco al español y lo publico en mi página con tus créditos.
¡Permiso concedido! Gracias!